{"id":7544,"date":"2020-04-27T17:26:05","date_gmt":"2020-04-27T22:26:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nickortizlaw.com\/?p=7544"},"modified":"2024-03-06T16:57:28","modified_gmt":"2024-03-06T21:57:28","slug":"parr-v-reliance-modest-activity-captured-on-surveillance-doesnt-equal-an-ability-to-work","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nickortizlaw.com\/parr-v-reliance-modest-activity-captured-on-surveillance-doesnt-equal-an-ability-to-work\/","title":{"rendered":"Parr v. Reliance – Modest Activity Captured on Surveillance Doesn’t Equal an Ability to Work"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Case Name: <\/strong>Cheri Parr v. First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Court: <\/strong>U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Date of Decision: <\/strong>March 31, 2017<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Type of Claim: <\/strong>Long-Term Disability benefits<\/a> under the civil enforcement provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Insurance Company: <\/strong>First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Claimant’s Employer: <\/strong>Monster Media<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Claimant’s Occupation \/ Job Position: <\/strong>The Plaintiff was a former marketing and sales executive<\/a> with approximately twenty years of experience. Before applying for disability benefits, she was West Coast Regional Sales Director for Monster Media.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Disabilities:\u00a0<\/strong>She was diagnosed with\u00a0Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome<\/a>\u00a0(“EDS”), a genetic tissue disorder, on May 9, 2013. The following list summarizes several key events in Plaintiff’s medical history, starting approximately five years before Plaintiff’s car accident:<\/p>\n\n\n\n