The Required Administrative Process in a Claim for Benefits under ERISA
The key to an ERISA disability benefits claim is make sure to follow all required steps in the administrative process. Claimants must “exhaust” their administrative remedies before filing a lawsuit. Failure to exhaust one’s administrative remedies may result in significant limitations on the standard and scope of court review in a lawsuit. This is why everything you do in the the administrative claims process may determine whether you are ultimately successful in your claim should you have to go to court.
Step One is to bring a claim to the plan administrator. A claim is a “request for plan benefit . . . made by a claimant in accordance with a plan’s reasonable procedure for filing benefit claims.” 29 C.F.R. §2560.503-1(e). As set forth in Abdel v. U.S. Bancorp, 457 F.3d 877 (8th Cir. 2006), a claim for benefits is made when claimant seeks benefits. Compare another case, Layes v. Mead Corp., 132 F.3d 1246 (8th Cir. 1998, wherein the court decided that there was no claim for benefits until formal procedures for filing claim are satisfied.
Typically, an application for benefits consists of three parts: (1) an application with detailed information from the claimant, (2) detailed information from the employer, and (3) the attending physician statement. Failure to complete any of these forms can be fatal to a claim. In the case Mitchell v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc’y of U.S., 310 Minn. 219, 224, 245 N.W.2d 618-620-21 (1976), the claimant was barred from filing suit for failing to supply the employee’s statement and physician’s statement.
There is also usually a requirement of timely notice of claim and a proof of loss or proof of claim consistent with your state’s insurance laws. However, late notice will usually only bar a claim where there is prejudice to the plan’s insurer. The notice prejudice rule that applies to an insured ERISA plan was set forth in UNUM Life Ins. Co. of America v. Ward, 526 U.S. 358, 369 (1999).