Has your disability claim been denied or terminated? Call (888) 321-8131 for help! We represent claimants nationwide.
Ortiz Law Firm | National Disability Law Firm
Ortiz Law Firm is dedicated to helping people recover the disability benefits they deserve. We handle group Long Term Disability (LTD) claims, individual disability insurance policy claims, ERISA disability claims, and Social Security Disability claims.
The first step in evaluating a Social Security disability claim is determining whether a claimant is performing “substantial gainful activity” or SGA. The Unsuccessful Work Attempt According to Social Security’s regulations, work you have done will not ordinarily show that you are capable of performing substantial gainful activity if, after working for a period of …
As an experienced Florida disability attorney who has handled thousands of complex disability cases since 2005, I am continually amazed that many lawyers still have not abandoned what I consider to be the dinosaur of billing method – the billable hourly rate. Why Would You Hire An Attorney At An Outrageous Hourly Fee When You …
MetLife forwarded responses from Santana’s treating physicians to Dr. Simon, an “independent physician,” who reviewed them and concluded that the MRI was normal for a person of Santana’s age and that Santana had still failed to submit clinical evidence showing that he had either radiculopathy or any limitations due to neuropathy. By a letter dated August 19, 2011, MetLife denied Santana’s administrative appeal and upheld its earlier decision to deny him continuing long-term disability benefits. The Court agreed with MetLife that.
None of Liberty’s arguments persuade the Court that denying long-term disability benefits to Ms. Rouleau is appropriate. The preponderance of the evidence – indeed, the great weight of the evidence – reflects that Ms. Rouleau remained “disabled” as the Policy defines it even after the expiration of the “own occupation” period and is therefore entitled to the long-term disability benefits she seeks.
Drew A. Carson (“Carson”) sought long-term disability (LTD) benefits for chronic pain and related mental health conditions, then argued that Unum Life Insurance Company of America (“Unum”) acted arbitrarily and capriciously by relying on file-only medical reviews rather than examining him in person. The court disagreed, finding no prohibition on file-only reviews by qualified physicians …
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented changes to every aspect of our lives. One area that is seeing dramatic changes is the healthcare industry. Hospitals have become trauma centers, and doctor’s offices have been overrun with patients experiencing COVID-19 symptoms. Many people are avoiding these areas for fear of contracting the virus. This has made …
Zaeske won reinstatement of his long-term disability (LTD) benefits at the trial court level after it found Liberty Life’s independent medical reviewers unreliable, but the Eighth Circuit reversed on appeal, ruling that those same physicians’ opinions were reasonable and that Liberty Life didn’t abuse its discretion in denying his claim. Case at a Glance Insurer …
Mozdzierz sought long-term disability (LTD) benefits from Aetna under an ERISA-governed plan, but the court upheld Aetna’s denial, finding it did not abuse its discretion. The case is worth noting for the court’s discussion of video surveillance as investigatory evidence in long-term disability claims. Case at a Glance Insurer Win Case Steven Mozdzierz v. Aetna …
A fast-growing lawsuit in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has been filed against the NFL by nearly 4,000 former football players. They claim that the NFL “propagated its own industry-funded and falsified research to support its position” that athletes cannot receive long-term brain damage from playing football. The league’s highest medical experts have for years …
The Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment: “As explained above, I have identified three primary reasons for determining that Aetna abused its discretion in denying Plaintiff’s benefits: Inappropriate reliance on unreliable findings by Drs. Topper, McPhee, and Polanco; failure to address Plaintiff’s qualifications and ability to engage in sedentary occupations in light of her medication requirements; and failure to address the findings in the APS and Capabilities and Limitations Worksheets showing that Plaintiff could not perform full-time sedentary work.
In granting summary judgment for MetLife, the district court reasoned that when Sumpter became disabled, Delphi’s plan did not provide the benefit he sought and that he was not entitled to equitable relief. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld this decision.
In this case, the plaintiff noted that the Policy’s states that “‘Proof’ means the evidence in support of a claim for benefits and includes, but is not limited to, the following.” Plaintiff thus argued that, while objective medical evidence may be sufficient to support a disability claim, it was not necessary to do so.
A court must take into consideration the conflict of interest inherent in a benefits system in which the entity that pays the long-term disability benefits maintains discretionary control over the ultimate benefits decision. This is done by weighing the structural conflict as one of the many factors relevant to the benefits determination decision. However, this conflict of interest …
Television personality Robin Roberts has disclosed that she has Myelodysplastic Syndrome, which can qualify an individual to receive long-term disability benefits. Myelodysplastic syndromes, commonly referred to as MDS, are not easily categorized. They encompass numerous different diseases and are a group of blood and bone marrow disorders. In MDS, stem cells do not mature normally. As such, …
One of the hardest things I must explain to clients is how the insurance company does not care about the client’s disabling condition. Disability insurance companies are for-profit corporations constantly seeking ways to increase their bottom lines. More often than not, they accomplish this by denying long-term disability (LTD) claims. In this article, we discuss an …
Unum Life Insurance Company of America (“Unum”) paid Wittmann 24 months of mental health long-term disability (LTD) benefits but denied her claim to the extent it was based on fibromyalgia and related physical symptoms, finding no medical evidence that she couldn’t perform her duties as an attorney. The court sided with Unum, ruling that its …
Rose Bigham, a Security Technical Program Manager at Amazon, filed suit after Liberty Life terminated her long-term disability benefits despite diagnoses of fibromyalgia, chronic pain, and degenerative disc disease. The court found that medical evidence from her treating physicians clearly supported her inability to perform the cognitive and interpersonal demands of her occupation.
Defendant advances two grounds for terminating the plaintiff’s long-term disability benefits. First, the defendant contends the plaintiff does not qualify for an exception to the “Other Limited Conditions” provision under the Plan because he does not have a herniated disc with documented neurological abnormalities. Second, the defendant claims the plaintiff is not disabled from all occupations and thus does not qualify for benefits during his policy's “Any Occupation” period. If established, either of these grounds would provide a recognized justification for the termination of the plaintiff’s benefits under the terms of the Plan.
The Fourth Circuit held that Sun Life abused its discretion when it terminated Wilkinson’s benefits because he provided sufficient evidence to support his eligibility for coverage and because Sun Life’s decision to terminate benefits was not the result of a principled reasoning process and not supported by substantial evidence. The Fourth Circuit, therefore, affirmed the district court’s decision.
Lincoln denied the Plaintiff’s LTD claim. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit in Federal Court. Lincoln filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law, to which Till responded with a motion for summary judgment. After a full briefing, the district court entered an order granting Lincoln’s motion and denying Till’s. The district court also subsequently denied Till’s motion to reconsider. After carefully considering the record on appeal, the parties’ briefs, and the relevant law, the Eleventh Circuit concluded that the district court decision is due to be affirmed.
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (“Reliance Standard”) repeatedly reversed course on Smith’s long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits after a series of heart attacks, strokes, and related conditions — paying, terminating, reinstating, then terminating again — despite every one of his treating physicians stating he could never return to work. After the district court ruled in Smith’s favor …
Ursula Mayer (“Mayer”) was an employee of Mercy Health Services, LLC (“Mercy”) and was covered under a long-term disability insurance policy that was issued by Cigna Group Insurance (“Cigna”). She claimed that she was totally disabled according to the definition within the policy, that she applied for benefits with Cigna, and that her claim was denied. …
The Court held that MetLife undermined the ERISA process by failing to issue a proper denial and, further, by failing to notify the insured about the issues in dispute. The Court ordered MetLife to pay past-due benefits, with interest, and to continue paying benefits so long as they continue to remain due under the provisions of the Plan, unless and until MetLife issues a denial that is in full compliance with the requirements contained in ERISA.
The Court concluded that Defendant did not act in an arbitrary and capricious manner in denying Plaintiff’s claim for long-term disability benefits. Accordingly, the Court overruled Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, and sustained Defendant’s Motion for Entry of Judgment on the Administrative Record.