• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Has your disability claim been denied or terminated? Call (888) 321-8131 for help!

  • Mail
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
Ortiz Law Firm logo

Ortiz Law Firm | National Disability Law Firm

Ortiz Law Firm is dedicated to helping people recover the disability benefits they deserve. We handle group Long Term Disability (LTD) claims, individual disability insurance policy claims, ERISA disability claims, and Social Security Disability claims.

  • ABOUT US
    • Nick Ortiz
    • Areas We Serve
    • Our Team
    • Our Case Results
    • Client Reviews and Testimonials
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • Long-Term Disability Insurance
      • Administrative Appeals
      • Lawsuits
      • Lump Sum Buyouts/Settlements
      • Frequently Asked Questions
      • Occupations That May Qualify
    • Social Security Disability Claims
      • Initial Applications
      • Appeal a Denial
      • Hearings Before an Administrative Law Judge
      • Frequently Asked Questions
      • Disabling Conditions
  • DISABLING CONDITIONS
  • INSURANCE CARRIERS
    • New York Life Group Benefit Solutions (Formerly Cigna)
    • Lincoln Financial
    • Reliance Standard
    • Prudential
    • The Hartford
    • The Standard
    • MetLife
    • Guardian
    • Unum
    • Insurance Company Tricks And Tactics
  • RESOURCES
    • Appeal a Long-Term Disability Denial
    • Long-Term Disability Buyout Calculator
    • eBooks, Guides, and More
    • Disability Law Blog
    • Video Library
    • Long-Term Disability Glossary
    • Abbreviations in Social Security Disability Claims
  • CONTACT

Home | Case Summary Blog | Page 3

Case Summary Blog

Robinson v. Aetna – Court Remands Claim For Any Occupation Review

April 27, 2023 // by Nick Ortiz

Plaintiff Laverne Robinson brought a lawsuit against Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”) and Mondelez Global LLC Employee-Paid Group Benefits Plan (“the Plan”) for unpaid long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Robinson was a former utility machine …

Read moreRobinson v. Aetna – Court Remands Claim For Any Occupation Review
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Aetna

Director of Software v. Unum – Court Finds Plaintiff Failed To Meet His Burden Of Proof

April 14, 2023 // by Nick Ortiz

On April 7, 2023, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts decided an ERISA long-term disability insurance case against the Unum Insurance Company of America. The Court ruled in favor of Unum. The claimant worked with Symbiotic LLC Plan as the Director of Software Quality Assurance. He had worked in the computer …

Read moreDirector of Software v. Unum – Court Finds Plaintiff Failed To Meet His Burden Of Proof
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Unum

Arenson v. Unum – Court Sides With Unum Under Deferential Standard Of Review

March 28, 2023 // by Nick Ortiz

Today we review Arenson v. First Unum Life Insurance Company that was decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Gregg Arenson was a futures and options trade broker. He sued his former employer’s benefits administrator, First Unum Life Insurance Company (hereinafter “Unum”) under ERISA. He …

Read moreArenson v. Unum – Court Sides With Unum Under Deferential Standard Of Review
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Unum

Moseley v. Unum – Unum Should Have Ordered IME

March 22, 2023 // by Nick Ortiz

Unum paid long-term disability (LTD) insurance benefits to Susan Moseley, but stopped paying after a period of time pursuant to the mental illness limitation in her long-term disability policy (a policy is also called a “plan” of benefits). Moseley appealed the case all the way to federal court, arguing that Unum abused its discretion …

Read moreMoseley v. Unum – Unum Should Have Ordered IME
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Unum

Marselle v. Unum – Kentucky District Court Finds Unum Made A Reasoned Determination

September 12, 2022 // by Nick Ortiz

Jonni Marselle was covered for long-term disability (LTD) benefits under a group plan provided to Humana, Marselle’s former employer. Marselle was a consultant with Humana. The position was sedentary as it required her to constantly sit, occasionally stand, and occasionally walk. She mostly did computer work. Her disabilities included …

Read moreMarselle v. Unum – Kentucky District Court Finds Unum Made A Reasoned Determination
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Unum

Foss v. Standard – “Own Occ” Is With Any Employer, Not A Specific Employer

September 2, 2022 // by Nick Ortiz

I’ve been away from case summaries for a bit. Going to turn that around with a recent decision in Foss v. Standard Insurance Company, Case No. 20-cv-2449, decided by the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on August 19, 2022. Unfortunately, the Court ruled in favor of the insurance company. Plaintiff Caroline …

Read moreFoss v. Standard – “Own Occ” Is With Any Employer, Not A Specific Employer
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Standard

Fowkes v. MetLife – Claimant Did Not Prove Disability

April 8, 2022 // by Nick Ortiz

Ms. Fowkes does not contend the Plan’s written evidence requirement violates ERISA. Instead, she takes issue with MetLife's procedures to evaluate her LTD claim. In particular, she contends MetLife required her to present “objective evidence” supporting her LTD claim. At the hearing, she argued that MetLife did not consider the cumulative effect of …

Read moreFowkes v. MetLife – Claimant Did Not Prove Disability
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: MetLife

Archer v. Hartford – Court Upholds Long-Term Disability Claim Denial

July 16, 2021 // by Nick Ortiz

The claimant in Archer v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company was an Assistant Store Manager at TJX Marshall’s Department Store. She had group long-term disability (LTD) coverage. She also had life insurance benefits. Both of these categories of group benefits were issued and administered by Hartford. Hartford had what we call …

Read moreArcher v. Hartford – Court Upholds Long-Term Disability Claim Denial
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Hartford

Cassidy v. Aetna – Court Holds There Is A Difference Between Diagnosis and Limitation

June 10, 2021 // by Nick Ortiz

In Cassidy v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky ruled in favor of Aetna in a long-term disability insurance claim. The decision was issued on May 21, 2021. The long-term disability insurance claim was governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Ms. Cassidy …

Read moreCassidy v. Aetna – Court Holds There Is A Difference Between Diagnosis and Limitation
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Aetna

Calkin v. USLIC – Court Finds Reasonable Basis For Long-Term Disability Denial

May 14, 2021 // by Nick Ortiz

Mr. Calkin was a 65-year-old manager of architectural design for AIG from June 10, 2013, through June 24, 2014. Mr. Calkin suffered from impingement syndrome in his left shoulder, brachial plexopathy (a form of neuropathy), bilateral shoulder pain, lower back pain due to degenerative disc disease and stenosis in his lumbar …

Read moreCalkin v. USLIC – Court Finds Reasonable Basis For Long-Term Disability Denial
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: AIG Benefits Solutions, United States Life Insurance Company (USLIC)

Harrison v. LINA – Claim Denied Based On Pre-Existing Condition Exclusion

May 11, 2021 // by Nick Ortiz

Ms. Harrison was a claimant who worked as a customer service representative for a cash advance lender. Her duties included selling financial products to customers, providing customer service, handling money, and overseeing financial transactions. She also suffered from depression and anxiety during her time at this place of …

Read moreHarrison v. LINA – Claim Denied Based On Pre-Existing Condition Exclusion
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Life Insurance Company of North America (LINA)

Senegal v. Reliance Standard – Court Remands Case For Further Review

January 7, 2021 // by Nick Ortiz

In this case, Tommy W. Senegal (“Senegal”) had a long-term disability policy that was administered by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (“Reliance Standard”) as a benefit of his employment by Cequel III, LLC (“Cequel”). Senegal worked for Cequel as a field service engineer; his duties were specifically related to supervising cable …

Read moreSenegal v. Reliance Standard – Court Remands Case For Further Review
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Reliance Standard

Donlick v. Standard – Claim Denial Was Not Arbitrary And Capricious

January 6, 2021 // by Nick Ortiz

Marybeth M. Donlick (“Donlick”) was employed as a truck driver for Chesapeake Energy Corporation (“Chesapeake”). Through her employment, Donlick received coverage for a long-term disability benefits plan, which was administered by Standard Insurance Company (“Standard”). On August 7, 2012, Donlick was in a motorcycle crash which caused her to have …

Read moreDonlick v. Standard – Claim Denial Was Not Arbitrary And Capricious
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Standard

Diaz v. Liberty Life – Court Rules LTD Claim Denial Was Supported

January 6, 2021 // by Nick Ortiz

In this case, David Diaz (“Diaz”) was the district manager at JM Family Enterprises, Inc. (“JM Family Enterprises”) between September 2010 and October 2015. JM Family Enterprises’ had an employee benefit plan which covered long-term disability benefits. This plan was insured by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (“Liberty”). Under the plan, …

Read moreDiaz v. Liberty Life – Court Rules LTD Claim Denial Was Supported
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Liberty Mutual

Deroo v. Unum – Court Rules Job Suitable For Claimant Doesn’t Exist

January 6, 2021 // by Nick Ortiz

Carianne Deroo (“Deroo”) worked as an employee for Beaumont Hospital as a Clinical Nurse II. This role involved full-time work as a registered nurse which required patient care. Through her employment with Beaumont Hospital, Deroo was covered by a long-term disability benefits policy which was administered by Unum Life Insurance Company of America …

Read moreDeroo v. Unum – Court Rules Job Suitable For Claimant Doesn’t Exist
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Unum

Counts v. United Of Omaha – Court Rules United Of Omaha Must Pay Benefits

January 6, 2021 // by Nick Ortiz

Brenda Counts (“Counts”) previously worked as an employee of Denver Wholesale Florist-Flint as a flower sales specialist. Her job title was formally known as “Inside Sales Associate” which required “making sales calls, pulling product[,] and packing.” Through her job, she held a disability insurance policy with United of Omaha Life Insurance …

Read moreCounts v. United Of Omaha – Court Rules United Of Omaha Must Pay Benefits
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Mutual of Omaha

Conner v. Sedgwick – Court Finds Claim Denial Was Reasonable And Supported

January 6, 2021 // by Nick Ortiz

Lisa Conner (“Conner”) was a perioperative nurse at St. Vincent’s Medical Center. Through her employment, she held a policy under the Ascension Health (“Ascension”) Long-Term Disability plan. Sedgwick administered this plan. The language of the plan explained that: On May 20, 2013, Conner was in a car accident that left her …

Read moreConner v. Sedgwick – Court Finds Claim Denial Was Reasonable And Supported
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Sedgwick

Benson v. Hartford – Court Affirms Hartford LTD Claim Denial

January 6, 2021 // by Nick Ortiz

Keyton Benson (“Benson”) was employed by Tower Hill Insurance Group. Through his employer, Benson was eligible for long-term disability benefits through a policy issued by Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”). The policy language states that it will provide a policyholder with monthly payments if he has: In addition, the …

Read moreBenson v. Hartford – Court Affirms Hartford LTD Claim Denial
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Hartford

Santana-Diaz v. MetLife – Court Rules “Clinical” Is Not An Ambiguous Term

June 29, 2020 // by Nick Ortiz

MetLife forwarded responses from Santana’s treating physicians to Dr. Simon, an “independent physician,” who reviewed them and concluded that the MRI was normal for a person of Santana’s age and that Santana had still failed to submit clinical evidence showing that he had either radiculopathy or any limitations due to neuropathy. By a letter dated …

Read moreSantana-Diaz v. MetLife – Court Rules “Clinical” Is Not An Ambiguous Term
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: MetLife

Rouleau v. Liberty Life – Court Assigns No Weight To Surveillance Video

June 29, 2020 // by Nick Ortiz

None of Liberty’s arguments persuade the Court that denying long-term disability benefits to Ms. Rouleau is appropriate. The preponderance of the evidence – indeed, the great weight of the evidence – reflects that Ms. Rouleau remained “disabled” as the Policy defines it even after the expiration of the “own occupation” period and is therefore …

Read moreRouleau v. Liberty Life – Court Assigns No Weight To Surveillance Video
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Liberty Mutual

Carson v. Unum – Court Rules File-Only Review Is Sufficient

May 18, 2020 // by Nick Ortiz

Drew A. Carson (“Carson”) was an attorney employed by Miller Goler Faeges LLP. Through his employment, he was covered by a long-term disability benefits plan which was administered by Unum Life Insurance Company of America (“Unum”). The plan explained that:  “‘Disability’ and ‘disabled’ mean that because of injury or sickness:  Further, proof …

Read moreCarson v. Unum – Court Rules File-Only Review Is Sufficient
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Unum

Zaeske v. Liberty Life – Appeals Court Reverses District Court Decision And Denies Claim

May 11, 2020 // by Nick Ortiz

The case summarized here involves Damon Zaeske (“Zaeske”), who was a project manager employed by Walmart. He ceased working on April 4, 2014, as a result of chronic back pain. Walmart’s insurance plan was underwritten by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (“Liberty Life”); Zaeske applied for long-term disability (LTD) …

Read moreZaeske v. Liberty Life – Appeals Court Reverses District Court Decision And Denies Claim
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Liberty Mutual

Mozdziers v. Aetna – Video Surveillance Supports LTD Claim Denial

May 11, 2020 // by Nick Ortiz

In Mozdzierz v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, the plaintiff (claimant) seeks long-term disability benefits from Aetna, the insurer of his ERISA-governed long-term disability plan. The Federal District Court (for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania) found that Aetna did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff’s …

Read moreMozdziers v. Aetna – Video Surveillance Supports LTD Claim Denial
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Aetna

Young v. Aetna – Aetna Committed Abuse Of Discretion In Denying LTD Claim

May 8, 2020 // by Nick Ortiz

The Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment: “As explained above, I have identified three primary reasons for determining that Aetna abused its discretion in denying Plaintiff’s benefits: Inappropriate reliance on unreliable findings by Drs. Topper, McPhee, and Polanco; failure to address Plaintiff’s qualifications and ability to …

Read moreYoung v. Aetna – Aetna Committed Abuse Of Discretion In Denying LTD Claim
Category: Case Summary Blog
Tags: Aetna
  • Previous
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 8
  • Next

Sidebar

Top Ten Mistakes That Will Destroy Your Long Term Disability Claim

View All Resources

Our Clients Love Us

I chose the Ortiz Law Firm because they were the only firm I could find that represents clients with M.C.A.S. and it was the best choice I could have possibly made. After receiving multiple denials I reached out to the Ortiz Law Firm for help. Mr. Ortiz and his entire staff were amazing to work with. Thanks to their expertise we were able to get STD/LTD and SSDI settlements. A special shout out to Tiffany and Amber for the great communication and help.

Charles D. Headshot
Charles D.

View All Testimonials

Recent Posts

  • Understanding Long-Term Disability Reviews: Why Your LTD Benefits Aren’t Guaranteed Forever
  • Peer Review Reports in Long-Term Disability Claims and Appeals
  • Ortiz Law Firm Secures Reinstatement of Long-Term Disability Benefits for Client Denied by Lincoln National
  • Why It Takes So Long to Receive a Decision on a Long-Term Disability Appeal
  • Ortiz Law Firm Helps Client Recover Long-Term Disability Benefits After New York Life Denial

Contact Us

Ortiz Law Firm is a national disability law firm specializing in long-term disability appeals, disability insurance lawsuits, and Social Security Disability claims. Contact us for a free case review.

(888) 321-8131
316 S Baylen St., Ste 590,
Pensacola, FL 32502

  • Mail
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Claims We Handle

  • Group Long-Term Disability
  • ERISA Disability Claims
  • Individual Disability Insurance
  • Social Security Disability Claims
  • Long-Term Care Insurance

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Nick Ortiz
  • Free Resources
  • Video Library
  • Client Testimonials
  • Successful LTD Appeals
  • Nationwide Representation
  • Refer a Case

Our Pensacola Office


Sitemap · Disclaimer · Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Ortiz Law Firm | National Disability Law Firm · All Rights Reserved